[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxh=F77vDAG0Ta9p7Fxf8-b4nCSv1ewfY6ikx3X42zwkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:32:50 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: provide include/asm/asm-prototypes.h for ARM
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:32:00PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>
>> Michal, what's your thoughts? If you merge my patch 2/2 and skip 1/2, it
>> should not give any new build warnings or errors, so then arch patches can
>> go via arch trees. 1/2 could go in after everyone is up to date.
>
> So what's the conclusion on this? I've just had a failure due to
> CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS reported on ARM, and it looks like (at
> least some of) patch 1 could resolve it.
Hmm. I've got
cc6acc11cad1 kbuild: be more careful about matching preprocessed asm
___EXPORT_SYMBOL
4efca4ed05cb kbuild: modversions for EXPORT_SYMBOL() for asm
in my tree. Is that sufficient, or do we still have issues?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists