| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <26d7b4c1-a7ef-7250-eb6a-270182d279ea@lechnology.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 21:31:14 -0600
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: ahaslam@...libre.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, khilman@...nel.org, kishon@...com
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5,3/5] USB: ohci: da8xx: Allow a regulator to handle VBUS
On 11/14/2016 08:41 AM, ahaslam@...libre.com wrote:
> Using a regulator to handle VBUS will eliminate the need for
> platform data and callbacks, and make the driver more generic
> allowing different types of regulators to handle VBUS.
>
> The regulator equivalents to the platform callbacks are:
> set_power -> regulator_enable/regulator_disable
> get_power -> regulator_is_enabled
> get_oci -> regulator_get_error_flags
> ocic_notify -> regulator event notification
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ohci-da8xx.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-da8xx.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-da8xx.c
> index 83e3c98..42eaeb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-da8xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-da8xx.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/usb-davinci.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/usb.h>
> #include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> @@ -36,8 +37,12 @@ static int (*orig_ohci_hub_control)(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq,
> static int (*orig_ohci_hub_status_data)(struct usb_hcd *hcd, char *buf);
>
> struct da8xx_ohci_hcd {
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> struct clk *usb11_clk;
> struct phy *usb11_phy;
> + struct regulator *vbus_reg;
> + struct notifier_block nb;
> + unsigned int is_powered;
Since is_powered is only used to indicate if we have called
regulator_enable(), I think it would make more sense to name it
reg_enabled instead.
> };
>
> #define to_da8xx_ohci(hcd) (struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *)(hcd_to_ohci(hcd)->priv)
> @@ -83,56 +88,103 @@ static void ohci_da8xx_disable(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>
> static int ohci_da8xx_set_power(struct usb_hcd *hcd, int on)
> {
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
> struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> + int ret;
>
> if (hub && hub->set_power)
> return hub->set_power(1, on);
>
> + if (!da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (on && !da8xx_ohci->is_powered) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Fail to enable regulator: %d\n", ret);
s/Fail/Failed/
> + return ret;
> + }
> + da8xx_ohci->is_powered = 1;
> +
> + } else if (!on && da8xx_ohci->is_powered) {
> + ret = regulator_disable(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Fail to disable regulator: %d\n", ret);
s/Fail/Failed/
> + return ret;
> + }
> + da8xx_ohci->is_powered = 0;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int ohci_da8xx_get_power(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
> struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>
> if (hub && hub->get_power)
> return hub->get_power(1);
>
> + if (da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg)
> + return regulator_is_enabled(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg);
> +
> return 1;
> }
>
> static int ohci_da8xx_get_oci(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
> struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> + unsigned int flags;
> + int ret;
>
> if (hub && hub->get_oci)
> return hub->get_oci(1);
>
> + if (!da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = regulator_get_error_flags(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg, &flags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (flags && REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT)
Is this supposed to be...
if (flags & REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT)
> + return 1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int ohci_da8xx_has_set_power(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
> struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>
> if (hub && hub->set_power)
> return 1;
>
> + if (da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg)
> + return 1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int ohci_da8xx_has_oci(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
> struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>
> if (hub && hub->get_oci)
> return 1;
>
> + if (da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg)
> + return 1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -160,15 +212,41 @@ static void ohci_da8xx_ocic_handler(struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub,
> hub->set_power(port, 0);
> }
>
> +static int ohci_da8xx_regulator_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long event, void *data)
> +{
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci =
> + container_of(nb, struct da8xx_ohci_hcd, nb);
> + struct device *dev = da8xx_ohci->hcd->self.controller;
> +
> + if (event & REGULATOR_EVENT_OVER_CURRENT) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "over current event\n");
Won't this result in duplicate overcurrent warnings in the kernel log?
It seems like in previous version of this patch series, we would get an
overcurrent error from the core usb driver.
> + ocic_mask |= 1;
I thought that a previous patch got rid of all globals. Why is ocic_mask
still a global variable?
> + ohci_da8xx_set_power(da8xx_ohci->hcd, 0);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ohci_da8xx_register_notify(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> {
> + struct da8xx_ohci_hcd *da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
> struct da8xx_ohci_root_hub *hub = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (hub && hub->ocic_notify)
> - return hub->ocic_notify(ohci_da8xx_ocic_handler);
> + ret = hub->ocic_notify(ohci_da8xx_ocic_handler);
nit: add { } around the if body too since there is { } around the else
if body.
> + else if (da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg) {
> + da8xx_ohci->nb.notifier_call = ohci_da8xx_regulator_event;
> + ret = devm_regulator_register_notifier(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg,
> + &da8xx_ohci->nb);
> + }
>
> - return 0;
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register notifier: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void ohci_da8xx_unregister_notify(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> @@ -331,6 +409,7 @@ static int ohci_da8xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> da8xx_ohci = to_da8xx_ohci(hcd);
> + da8xx_ohci->hcd = hcd;
>
> da8xx_ohci->usb11_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "usb11");
> if (IS_ERR(da8xx_ohci->usb11_clk)) {
> @@ -348,6 +427,18 @@ static int ohci_da8xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err;
> }
>
> + da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "vbus");
> + if (IS_ERR(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg);
> + if (error == -ENODEV) {
> + da8xx_ohci->vbus_reg = NULL;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Failed to get regulator: %d\n", error);
I'm pretty sure that the probe error number is displayed elsewhere in
the kernel log, so probably no need for %d here.
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> hcd->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
> if (IS_ERR(hcd->regs)) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists