[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161121094321.GH3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:43:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] msr-trace.h:42 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:02:25AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > it got away with attached change.. but this rcu logic
> > is far beyond me, so it's just wild guess.. ;-)
>
> If in idle, the _rcuidle() is needed, so:
Well, the point is, only this one rdmsr users is in idle, all the others
are not, so we should not be annotating _all_ of them, should we?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists