linux-kernel - Re: [RFT v2 2/5] ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8580: Remove old platforms and drop mach-types usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <713e7f53-16b2-a510-e99e-77e785f8a7c1@metafoo.de>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:34:08 +0100
From:   Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT v2 2/5] ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8580: Remove old platforms and
 drop mach-types usage

On 11/21/2016 11:30 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 11/20/2016 08:24 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> MACH_SMDKC100, MACH_SMDKV210 and MACH_SMDKC110 are no longer supported
>> so we can drop the dead code.  After this the driver no longer
>> differentiates between machines (S3C24xx machines are not supported by
>> it) so there is no need to override I2S device id in cpu_dai_name and
>> SEC_PLAYBACK dai_link can be removed as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Not tested. The driver did not override .platform_name which looks
>> suspicious to me. However I did not want to add changes which could have
>> some visible impact on output code.
> 
> The patch looks good to me. However the existing smdk64xx sound support
> less so. I don't have smdk6410 set up for testing yet, possibly I get
> around that next week.
> Indeed it's strange .platform_name is not also "samsung-i2s.2".

I think that is a fallout from commit a08485d8fdf6f ("ASoC: Samsung: Do not
register samsung audio dma device as pdev"). Given nobody noticed this in
the last 4 years maybe its time to drop this machine driver as well.