linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] DW DMAC: update device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1479724626.22212.50.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:37:06 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Cc:     "vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] DW DMAC: update device tree

On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 10:02 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 21:26 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 22:12 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > > 
> > > It wasn't possible to enable some features like
> > > memory-to-memory transfers or multi block transfers via DT.
> > > It is fixed by these patches.
> > 
> > First of all, please, give time to reviewers to comment the patches.
> > Usually it should be at least 24h (for the series that has been sent
> > first time 1 week approximately).
> 
> I'm not really sure a lot of people get disturbed by this series
> and given this all has been discussed for months now I'd really like
> to see changes required for our HW to work to land in upstream ASAP.

I understand your concern, I'm often in the same position in many areas,
including this driver (I'm not a maintainer of slave DMA subsystem).

Though let's face the issues we have with the series:
- stuff regarding to style and alike (would be fixed in a day)
- DTS naming and conventions, this is apparently a big area, where I
might share opinion, but can't decide for
- last word by the subsystem maintainer

> Too bad we're late for 4.9 (which is supposed to be the next LTS) but
> > we need to make sure this series hits 4.10 for sure.

Vinod, is it possible to get in for this series (if we get Ack from DT
people)?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy