[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161121170612.GT26852@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:06:13 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] msr-trace.h:42 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> > it got away with attached change.. but this rcu logic
> > is far beyond me, so it's just wild guess.. ;-)
>
> I think I prefer something like the below, that only annotates the one
> RDMSR in question, instead of all of them.
It would be far better to just fix trace points that they always work.
This whole thing is a travesty: we have tens of thousands of lines of code in
ftrace to support tracing in NMIs, but then "debug features"[1] like
this come around and make trace points unusable for far more code than
just the NMI handlers.
-Andi
[1] unclear what they actually "debug" here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists