[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43b518a92352986f09b0893646ff8016@agner.ch>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:22:09 -0800
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Minor code cleanup and error
path fixes
On 2016-11-20 21:54, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Code cleanup for improving code readability and error path fixes
> and cleanup removing use of devm_kfree.
Two things in one, not very nice. Especially the dma_free_coherent is
really a bug and the other is a cleanup. Can you make a separate patch
for the bug?
As for the cleanup, I don't like the one line conditions too, but I
don't think it is worth a patch. At least the TX path should be solved
with my suggestion in patch 2.
--
Stefan
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> index 08882f7..2987a16 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> @@ -226,8 +226,10 @@ static void dspi_rx_dma_callback(void *arg)
> if (!(dspi->dataflags & TRAN_STATE_RX_VOID)) {
> for (i = 0; i < dma->curr_xfer_len; i++) {
> d = dspi->dma->rx_dma_buf[i];
> - rx_word ? (*(u16 *)dspi->rx = d) :
> - (*(u8 *)dspi->rx = d);
> + if (rx_word)
> + *(u16 *)dspi->rx = d;
> + else
> + *(u8 *)dspi->rx = d;
> dspi->rx += rx_word + 1;
> }
> }
> @@ -247,14 +249,20 @@ static int dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit(struct
> fsl_dspi *dspi)
> tx_word = is_double_byte_mode(dspi);
>
> for (i = 0; i < dma->curr_xfer_len - 1; i++) {
> - val = tx_word ? *(u16 *) dspi->tx : *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> + if (tx_word)
> + val = *(u16 *) dspi->tx;
> + else
> + val = *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] =
> SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(val) | SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
> SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0) | SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
> dspi->tx += tx_word + 1;
> }
>
> - val = tx_word ? *(u16 *) dspi->tx : *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> + if (tx_word)
> + val = *(u16 *) dspi->tx;
> + else
> + val = *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] = SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(val) |
> SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
> SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0);
> @@ -430,9 +438,11 @@ static int dspi_request_dma(struct fsl_dspi
> *dspi, phys_addr_t phy_addr)
> return 0;
>
> err_slave_config:
> - devm_kfree(dev, dma->rx_dma_buf);
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, DSPI_DMA_BUFSIZE,
> + dma->rx_dma_buf, dma->rx_dma_phys);
> err_rx_dma_buf:
> - devm_kfree(dev, dma->tx_dma_buf);
> + dma_free_coherent(dev, DSPI_DMA_BUFSIZE,
> + dma->tx_dma_buf, dma->tx_dma_phys);
> err_tx_dma_buf:
> dma_release_channel(dma->chan_tx);
> err_tx_channel:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists