linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the lightnvm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <62938018-d3b8-d184-9498-e471811e6e27@bjorling.me>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:59:11 +0100
From:   Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the lightnvm
 tree

On 11/22/2016 08:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/lightnvm/core.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   7b0d392f6957 ("lightnvm: remove sysfs configuration interface")
> 
> from the lightnvm tree and commit:
> 
>   389b2a1c0e90 ("lightnvm: make core.c explicitly non-modular")
> 
> from the char-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the code that was commented by the
> latter, so I just removed it) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> I do wonder why commit 389b2a1c0e90 is in the char-misc tree and not
> the lightnvm or block trees?
> 

greg beat me to it. Thanks for fixing it up Stephen.

-matias