lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161122122741.vo5e6udfkda5ke5d@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:27:41 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     prahlad venkata <prahlad.eee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: reinit of completion variable

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:54:06PM +0530, prahlad venkata wrote:
> Did anybody got chance to review this patch?
> I feel this is a trivial yet required fix.

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.

Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ