[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161122130208.GD316@dell.lan>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:02:08 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc: tony@...mide.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com, t-kristo@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: palmas: Remove redundant check in
palmas_power_off
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Keerthy wrote:
> palmas_dev and palmas_power_off are always assigned together.
> So the check for palmas_dev inside palmas_power_off function
> is redundant. Removing the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> index 8f8bacb..ee9e9ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
> @@ -431,9 +431,6 @@ static void palmas_power_off(void)
> unsigned int addr;
> int ret, slave;
>
> - if (!palmas_dev)
> - return;
> -
> slave = PALMAS_BASE_TO_SLAVE(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE);
> addr = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE, PALMAS_DEV_CTRL);
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists