linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1479826691.1942.11.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 06:58:11 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime
 services

On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:17 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> 
> > Small nit, checkpatch usually complains that this should be written as
> > 12-character SHA-1 followed by the commit subject, i.e.
> > 
> > 0a637ee61247 ("x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary boot services")
> 
> In this case, checkpatch is wrong.

Why do you think so?