[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161122013913.GC5197@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:39:13 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: Fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal
On (11/22/16 10:33), Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:28:12AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (11/22/16 10:22), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > > Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Link: lkml.kernel.org/r/20161121132140.12683-1-tiwai@...e.de
> > > > Fixes: 17ec4cd98578 ("zram: don't call idr_remove() from zram_remove()")
> > > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> [4.5+]
> > >
> > > 17ec4cd98578 marked as stable: [4.2+] so we should mark this patch as
> > > 4.2+.
> >
> > well, no objections. except that the patch in question was
> > not picked up -stable
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c?id=refs/tags/v4.2#n1365
> >
> > the change appears starting from 4.5
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c?id=refs/tags/v4.5#n1371
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c?id=refs/tags/v4.4.34#n1370
oh, ok. good find. 4.4+ then? there are no affected stable/longterm
kernels older than 4.4.x anyway (4.1 lts has no dynamic zram management).
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists