linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] regulator: handling of error conditions for usb drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161122164028.ghwtxgmx7vlr6edy@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:40:28 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
Cc:     Leanne Girdwood <girdwood@...il.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] regulator: handling of error conditions for usb
 drivers

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Axel Haslam wrote:

> im wondering if you have these 2 patches in queue,
> if there are no objections would it be possible to take them?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)