[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479833468.1942.15.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:51:08 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime
services
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 16:40 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> > Umm, no, that's not correct.
> > SHA-1 lengths of 12 are unique for quite awhile yet.
> >
> > https://blog.cuviper.com/2013/11/10/how-short-can-git-abbreviate/
>
> The article says:
>
> 1.9% at 12
>
> which is for 3253824 objects (I get 1.86%).
>
> However, that was three years ago, and we now have over five million objects,
> so the collision possibility is 4.5% now.
>
> If we add another 2 million over the next three years, then the probability
> will be over 8% then.
>
> I've attached my spreadsheet for you to have a look at.
>
> > No. Use --format=email as appropriate instead.
>
> Fix checkpatch. This is an entirely reasonable supposition.
No. There's nothing to fix there IMO.
Of course you are welcome to submit patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists