linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Use ACPI to set max frequency of sdio host

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161122163739.GA10111@zach-desktop>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:37:40 -0600
From:   Zach Brown <zach.brown@...com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci-pci: Use ACPI to set max frequency of
 sdio host

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:27:29AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> Please try to not forget to bump the version number and to provide a
> history of the what changes between revisions. It makes life easier
> when reviewing and when I am about to apply patches.
>

Sorry, I'll make sure to include a history.
When switching from RFC to PATCH should the version number of the PATCH
be 1 or the lastest RFC version plus 1? Or does it not matter either way
as long as the history is present?

--
Zach