[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161122172914.GA2555@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:29:14 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andre Noll <maan@...bingen.mpg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Yibin Yang <yibyang@...co.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.4.34
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 06:22:47PM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 18:06, Greg KH wrote
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:59:12PM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 21, 10:28, Greg KH wrote
> > > > I'm announcing the release of the 4.4.34 kernel.
> > > >
> > > > All users of the 4.4 kernel series must upgrade.
> > >
> > > This update broke PXE boot on our 4-way AMD boxes. The kernel panics in
> > > eth_type_trans(), presumably during kernel-level IP autoconfiguration,
> > > see [1]. Bisection points me at 5c67f947 (net: __skb_flow_dissect()
> > > must cap its return value). And indeed, reverting this commit fixes
> > > the problem for me.
> > >
> > > Investigation showed that the real problem is not the change in the
> > > above commit per se (i.e., capping ->thoff) but the fact that in the
> > > success case, where we jump to the "out_good" label, ->thoff is now
> > > set *after* ->n_proto and ->ip_proto. I fail to see how order matters
> > > here, but it clearly does, since the crash is 100% reproducible,
> > > and is fixed by the commit below (on top of v4.4.34).
> > >
> > > Please consider applying something like the patch below for mainline
> > > and -stable.
> >
> > If this issue is also the same for Linus's tree, we should cc: netdev so
> > that the patch can get into there, right?
>
> Right, but I haven't tested PXE boot on any kernel newer than 4.4.x
> so far. All I can say for sure is that the problematic commit is
> also in Linus' tree (called 34fad54c there).
>
> Do you want me to check if mainline is also affected?
That would be great if you could do so.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists