lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLdtfoYDVoszduyKCpmZpYcpV2=UnwbjAzH0G08nzNwbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:46:52 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "maan@...bingen.mpg.de" <maan@...bingen.mpg.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "willemb@...gle.com" <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "yibyang@...co.com" <yibyang@...co.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.4.34

.
>
> I was wondering if we shouldn't just cap all cases?
>
> It seems like this could potentially return a value greater than skb-
>>len in the "good" case since things like IP header length isn't
> validated other then making sure it meets the minimum value, and if
> there isn't a recognized L4 header after that we could return that as a
> final value.
>

I honestly think you are looking at the wrong causes.

This is an aliasing problem.
Tom code is hard to read and understand.

Andre, could you try :

diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index 69e4463a4b1b..b045980faaea 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb,
                memcpy(key_eth_addrs, &eth->h_dest, sizeof(*key_eth_addrs));
        }

+       barrier();
 again:
        switch (proto) {
        case htons(ETH_P_IP): {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ