[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479846079.3064.16.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:21:19 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...e.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...hat.com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>
> Not a big fan of that part.. would not something like the below cure
> that?
>
> It would be slightly less optimal for Power7 but would actually be
> faster (on average) for the ITMT case, but most importantly, it does
> away with that extra weak function.
Okay. I have made this change to get rid off the extra weak function.
However, two patches are affected. So I think it is cleaner to refresh
the whole patch set. I'll send out the refreshed v8 patch set separately.
Thanks.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists