linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201611231531.DGH52135.QtFVOFJLOHFOSM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:31:20 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     john.johansen@...onical.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] CaitSith LSM module

Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> John Johansen wrote:
> > > In order to minimize the burden of reviewing, this patchset implements
> > > only functionality of checking program execution requests (i.e. execve()
> > > system call) using pathnames. I'm planning to add other functionalities
> > > after this version got included into mainline. You can find how future
> > > versions of CaitSith will look like at http://caitsith.osdn.jp/ .
> > > 
> > Thanks I've started working my way through this, but it is going to take
> > me a while.
> > 
> 
> Thank you for your time.

May I hear the status? Is there something I can do other than waiting?

I wrote a full manual for this patchset as http://caitsith.osdn.jp/index2.html .
Does anybody have fundamental objection against CaitSith?