[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uGv11kk08myiSmt0-R3zMZrWcYo3-o9Pnj0JAFDxVuG3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:45:55 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: remove fbdev drivers
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> Since the fbdev framework is in maintenance mode and all new display drivers
>>> should be made with the DRM framework, remove the fbdev drivers from staging.
>>>
>>> Note: the patches are created with git format-patch -D, so they can't be
>>> applied. Only for review.
>>
>> +1 from my side. Now that we have the simple pipe helpers in drm-kms, and
>> a few drivers starting to use them, there's really no reasons left anymore
>> to have fbdev drivers.
>
> I haven't been following this that closely, so can you please point me to a
> sample DRM driver using this simple pipe helper?
Bummer, they still haven't landed. But afaik there's at least 4 of
them floating around in various places ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists