linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3710.1479895641@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:07:21 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit [ver #2]

Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> > +	if (boot_params.secure_boot) {
> > +		set_bit(EFI_SECURE_BOOT, &efi.flags);
> > +		pr_info("Secure boot enabled\n");
> > +	}
> > +#endif
> > +
> 
> Section 20 of Documentation/CodingStyle recommends IS_ENABLED()
> instead of #ifdef.

The problem is this:

	arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:75: undefined reference to `efi'

To quote section 20: "... Thus, you still have to use an #ifdef if the code
inside the block references symbols that will not exist if the condition is
not met."

> Also, CONFIG_EFI_STUB might be more apt than CONFIG_EFI.

Other stuff in the same function is contingent on CONFIG_EFI.  EFI_STUB is to
do with how the thing can be booted, I think - not whether EFI support is
enabled.

David