[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161123143200.GV3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:32:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle@...il.com>,
Nicolai Hähnle <Nicolai.Haehnle@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] locking/ww_mutex: Fix a deadlock affecting ww_mutexes
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:25:25PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Without thinking it through in detail this is a PI issue, except that we
> replace boosting with wakeup&back-off. Could we perhaps steal something
> from rt mutexes to make it fair&efficient?
rt_mutexes order the waiters by 'priority' and wake the top most.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists