[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161123200614.GX3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:06:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...el.com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, mark.rutland@....com, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] perf/x86: output NMI overhead
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:40AM -0500, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
>
> NMI handler is one of the most important part which brings overhead.
>
> There are lots of NMI during sampling. It's very expensive to log each
> NMI. So the accumulated time and NMI# will be output when event is going
> to be disabled or task is scheduling out.
> The newly introduced flag PERF_EF_LOG indicate to output the overhead
> log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
> kernel/events/core.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
The subject says this patch is x86 specific, but most changes are in
core code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists