[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161123201317.GB3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:13:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...el.com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, mark.rutland@....com, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] perf/x86: Introduce PERF_RECORD_OVERHEAD
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:39AM -0500, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> +/*
> + * single overhead record layout:
> + *
> + * cpu: The cpu which overhead occues
This is duplicate information, its already present in sample_id when
PERF_SAMPLE_CPU, and without that we don't care.
> + * nr: Times of overhead happens.
> + * E.g. for NMI, nr == times of NMI handler are called.
> + * time: Total overhead cost(ns)
> + */
> +struct perf_overhead_entry {
> + __u32 cpu;
> + __u64 nr;
> + __u64 time;
> +};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists