[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j15suAbq8ZFdg5s4j9x+V8v3EoUNUL4DJT6ZLSjZ+UWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:38:39 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Stop sched tick in idle injection task
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Jacob Pan
>
>>
>> Any objections anyone?
>>
>> If not, I'll queue up this series for 4.10.
>
> 1h30 is a bit short to expect people to have even seen this, let alone
> reviewed.
I didn't say I'd queue it up right away. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists