[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161124051034.GE9376@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:40:34 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue
to SCHED_FIFO task
On 24-11-16, 05:51, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > + * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, schedutil governor shoots the
> > + * frequency to maximum. And special care must be taken to ensure that
> > + * this kthread doesn't result in that.
> > + *
> > + * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
> > + * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() and before that schedutil
> > + * rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
> > + *
> > + * Though there is a very rare case where the RT thread yields right
> > + * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
> > + * neglected for now.
> > + */
>
> s/schedutil governor/
> the schedutil governor
>
> s/And special care must be taken/
> Special care must be taken
>
> s/at the end of the sugov_work()/
> at the end of the sugov_work() function
>
> s/before that schedutil rejects/
> before the schedutil governor rejects
>
> s/Though there is a very rare case where
> There is a very rare case though, where
Thanks. I will send a fix for this.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists