linux-kernel - [PATCH] PM / OPP: fix CPU device to be removed from OPP table in wrong order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1479973761-21225-1-git-send-email-jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:49:21 +0900
From:   Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>
To:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vireshk@...nel.org, nm@...com,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, len.brown@...el.com,
        pavel@....cz, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jy0922.shim@...sung.com
Subject: [PATCH] PM / OPP: fix CPU device to be removed from OPP table in wrong
 order

The device that creates OPP table first should be removed from dev_list
of OPP table in last because it can be used by other resources
(supported_hw, prop_name, regulator), but not now. If OPP table is
shared by several CPUs, the CPU device that creates OPP table can be
removed earlier than other CPU devices.

This patch makes that the CPU device that creates OPP table is removed
last.

Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
index 8c3434bdb26d..9d0773a237f8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
@@ -118,9 +118,36 @@ void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table);
 #endif	/* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
 
+static bool dev_pm_opp_is_removed_last(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct opp_device *opp_dev;
+	struct opp_table *opp_table;
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock);
+
+	opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	if (list_is_singular(&opp_table->dev_list))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	opp_dev = list_last_entry(&opp_table->dev_list, struct opp_device,
+				  node);
+	if (opp_dev->dev == dev)
+		ret = true;
+
+unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&opp_table_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void _dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask, bool of)
 {
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
+	struct device *last = NULL;
 	int cpu;
 
 	WARN_ON(cpumask_empty(cpumask));
@@ -133,11 +160,23 @@ void _dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask, bool of)
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (!last && dev_pm_opp_is_removed_last(cpu_dev)) {
+			last = cpu_dev;
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (of)
 			dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(cpu_dev);
 		else
 			dev_pm_opp_remove_table(cpu_dev);
 	}
+
+	if (last) {
+		if (of)
+			dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(last);
+		else
+			dev_pm_opp_remove_table(last);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.9.1