[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161124085926.GV10134@dell.home>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:59:26 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Marcel Partap <mpartap@....net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: cpcap: Add minimal support
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> [161121 03:43]:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_I2C) += mc13xxx-i2c.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CORE) += mfd-core.o
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_EZX_PCAP) += ezx-pcap.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CPCAP) += cpcap.o
> >
> > Who is the manufacturer?
>
> Hmm that I don't know. There seems to be both ST and TI versions
> of this chip manufactured for Motorola. So my guess is that it
> should be Motorola unless there's some similar catalog part
> available from ST used by others. If anybody has more info
> on this please let me know :)
If this IP is shared amongst vendors, it usually means it was designed
by someone else? Synopsis perhaps?
> > > + cpcap->vendor = (val >> 6) & 0x0007;
> > > + cpcap->revision = ((val >> 3) & 0x0007) | ((val << 3) & 0x0038);
> >
> > Lots of magic numbers here. I suggest you define them.
>
> I'll check if some earlier code has these defined. Otherwise I'll
> just add a comment on the lack of available documentation.
*sad face*
Does that mean you don't even know what they're for?
> > > + error = cpcap_init_irq_bank(cpcap, 0, 0, 16);
> >
> > 'ret' is more traditional.
>
> FYI error seems to be preferred over ret as it's meaning is
> clear, git grep "error =" drivers/input for example.
> I can of course change it if you prefer ret over error.
I'd prefer to stick to the conventions of *this* subsystem.
... and the most common convention used kernel wide:
$ git grep "ret =" | wc -l
117976
$ git grep "err =" | wc -l
56708
$ git grep "error =" | wc -l
14427
> > > + error = cpcap_init_irq_bank(cpcap, 2, 32, 64);
> > > + if (error)
> > > + return error;
> >
> > I don't think I've seen this method of adding bulk IRQ chips before.
> > Isn't there a cleaner or generic way to do this?
>
> I'll check.
>
> ...
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_LDEB 0x1270 /* LMR Debounce Settings */
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_LGDET 0x1274 /* LMR GCAI Detach Detect */
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_LMISC 0x1278 /* LMR Misc Bits */
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_LMACE 0x127c /* LMR Mace IC Support */
> > > +
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_TEST 0x7c00 /* Test */
> > > +
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_ST_TEST1 0x7d08 /* ST Test1 */
> > > +
> > > +#define CPCAP_REG_ST_TEST2 0x7d18 /* ST Test2 */
> >
> > It would be nice to line up the entire file. #OCD
>
> Hmm care to clarify what you mean here? I think it's lined up with
I'm missing context now you've <snip>ed.
These look straight, however is the whole file lined up (as much as
*practically* possible)?
> tabs to line up. I left empty lines where the registers are not
> contiguous. What does #OCD mean, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder over
> header files maybe? :)
Yes, that's what it means.
/me likes straight lines. :)
> Anywys thanks for the review, the rest of the comments I will just
> fix and repost.
Welcome.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists