[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479984758.19726.7.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 02:52:38 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, chanwoo@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PM / devfreq: Fix the checkpatch warnings
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 19:46 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2016년 11월 24일 19:20, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:01 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > > This patch just fixes the checkpatch warnings.
> >
> > unrelated trivia:
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
[]
> > > @@ -576,11 +575,13 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
> > > goto err_out;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned int) *
> > > + devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> > > + sizeof(unsigned int) *
> > > devfreq->profile->max_state *
> > > devfreq->profile->max_state,
> > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev, sizeof(unsigned long) *
> > > + devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> > > + sizeof(unsigned long) *
> > > devfreq->profile->max_state,
> > > GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Maybe these should be devm_kcalloc calls
>
> Why should devfreq use the devm_kcalloc?
Because these are allocating zeroed arrays of a specific size.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists