[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdazkanxGsQ6G=NrHc0duR46FLhA81BkZF4HpdxJECWHaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:26:51 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Shrirang Bagul <shrirang.bagul@...onical.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@...com>,
Tiberiu Breana <tiberiu.a.breana@...el.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@...rot.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: st_accel: Support sensor i2c probe using acpi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Shrirang Bagul
<shrirang.bagul@...onical.com> wrote:
> Add support to probe st_accel sensors on i2c bus using ACPI. Compatible
> strings are not avaialable on ACPI based systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shrirang Bagul <shrirang.bagul@...onical.com>
(...)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id st_accel_acpi_match[] = {
> + {"SMO8A90", LNG2DM},
> + { },
> +};
Why is ACPI only supporting one out of 14 devices?
Surely there are some out-of-tree ACPI platforms using one
or more of the others?
Apart from that it looks nice.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists