linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161124141149.GE2213@rric.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:11:49 +0100
From:   Robert Richter <robert.richter@...ium.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
CC:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix memmap to be initialized for the entire
 section

On 24.11.16 13:58:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 13:51, Robert Richter <robert.richter@...ium.com> wrote:
> > On 24.11.16 13:44:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2016 at 13:42, Robert Richter <robert.richter@...ium.com> wrote:
> >> > On 23.11.16 21:25:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> Why? MEMREMAP_WB is used often, among other things for mapping
> >> >> firmware tables, which are marked as NOMAP, so in these cases, the
> >> >> linear address is not mapped.
> >> >
> >> > If fw tables are mapped wb, that is wrong and needs a separate fix.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why is that wrong?
> >
> > The whole issue with mapping acpi tables is not marking them cachable,
> > what wb does.
> 
> What 'issue'?
> 
> > Otherwise we could just use linear mapping for those mem
> > ranges.
> >
> 
> Regions containing firmware tables are owned by the firmware, and it
> is the firmware that tells us which memory attributes we are allowed
> to use. If those attributes include WB, it is perfectly legal to use a
> cacheable mapping. That does *not* mean they should be covered by the
> linear mapping. The linear mapping is read-write-non-exec, for
> instance, and we may prefer to use a read-only mapping and/or
> executable mapping.

Ok, I am going to fix try_ram_remap().

Are there other concerns with this patch?

Thanks,

-Robert