linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: Add support for Turris Omnia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:07:00 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
Cc:     Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: Add support for Turris Omnia

> @Tomas: I think it doesn't make sense when we alternate sending patches
> without prior arrangement. Do you already work on a v5? If not I can do
> that to fix the last few comments. Not sure when a submission is too
> late to enter v4.10, but I think the window isn't that big any more.

It is getting a bit late. But maybe Linus will add in another -rc
week.

> 
> > No leds? No buttons via gpio-keys?
> 
> The leds are controlled by a Cortex-M0 and without intervention blink
> according to a hardware function (network, power, pci). IMHO that's ok
> for an initial setup.

Yes. That is fine. It is just unusual. Most boards have gpio-led and
gpio-keys, which are easy to add. That is why i asked. Adding an LED
driver which talks to this M0 can be added later.

       Andrew