linux-kernel - Re: Tearing down DMA transfer setup after DMA client has finished

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58370530.5080605@free.fr>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:20:16 +0100
From:   Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To:     Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>,
        Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Tearing down DMA transfer setup after DMA client has finished

On 24/11/2016 15:17, Måns Rullgård wrote:

> Mason wrote:
> 
>> [   35.085854] SETUP DMA
>> [   35.088272] START NAND TRANSFER
>> [   35.091670] tangox_dma_pchan_start from tangox_dma_irq
>> [   35.096882] tango_dma_callback from vchan_complete
>> [   45.102513] DONE FAKE SPINNING
>>
>> So the IRQ rolls in, the ISR calls tangox_dma_pchan_start,
>> which calls tangox_dma_pchan_detach to tear down the sbox
>> setup; and only sometime later does the DMA framework call
>> my callback function.
> 
> Yes, I realised this soon after I said it.  The dma driver could be
> rearranged to make it work though.

There is a way to make the tasklet run and invoke the callback
before the interrupt service routine proceeds? Can you say more
about this?


>> So far, the work-arounds I've tested are:
>>
>> 1) delay sbox tear-down by 10 µs in tangox_dma_pchan_detach.
>> 2) statically setup sbox in probe, and never touch it henceforth.
>>
>> WA1 is fragile, it might break for devices other than NFC.
>> WA2 is what I used when I wrote the NFC driver.
>>
>> Can tangox_dma_irq() be changed to have the framework call
>> the client's callback *before* tangox_dma_pchan_start?
>>
>> (Thinking out loud) The DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT requests that the
>> DMA framework invoke the callback from tasklet context,
>> maybe a different flag DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT_EX can request
>> calling the call-back directly from within the ISR?
>>
>> (Looking at existing flags) Could I use DMA_CTRL_ACK?
>> Description sounds like some kind hand-shake between
>> client and dmaengine.
>>
>> Grepping for DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT, I don't see where the framework
>> checks that flag to spawn the tasklet? Or is that up to each
>> driver individually?
> 
> Those flags all have defined meanings and abusing them for other things
> is a bad idea.  As far as possible, device drivers should work with any
> dma driver.

I was asking about introducing a new flag, not abusing existing
flags. (I don't understand the semantics of DMA_CTRL_ACK.)

(FWIW, both the NFC and the MBUS agent are custom designs,
not third-party IP blocks.)

Regards.