[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161124152511.GC4776@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:25:11 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: many "changed bandwidth, new config is" messages in the log
On Thu 24-11-16 16:12:14, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 15:07 +0000, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > I have only now managed to move to 4.9-rc5 (from 4.8) and started
> > seeing quite a lot of following messages
> > "
> > [ 346.612211] wlan0: AP c0:4a:00:f1:48:f2 changed bandwidth, new
> > config is 2472 MHz, width 1 (2472/0 MHz)
> > [ 352.655929] wlan0: AP c0:4a:00:f1:48:f2 changed bandwidth, new
> > config is 2472 MHz, width 2 (2462/0 MHz)
> > "
>
> I don't think these messages are new in any way. checking ... nope,
> it's been around that way since 3.9 :-)
Right you are. I must have missed them before and git grep + git blame
fooled me.
> > It always seems to be changing width from 1 -> 2 and back
>
> Makes sense, that's 20 MHz <-> 40 MHz.
>
> Did you buy a new device that says it's 40 MHz incompatible or
> something?
I am using this device for years now. It is a cheap TP-Link home
wireless router. So hard to tell about above. I am far from an expert.
> Or perhaps one of your neighbors did ... Or something is
> causing interference that makes the AP switch around.
This might be possible. There are quite some devices broadcasting around
$ sudo iwlist wlan0 scan | grep "Channel:" | sort | uniq -c
6 Channel:1
6 Channel:11
1 Channel:112
2 Channel:13
2 Channel:3
7 Channel:6
1 Channel:9
my router is at channel 13 so there seems to be something else sitting
there as well.
> > $ dmesg | grep "changed bandwidth" | wc -l
> > 42
> > in 13 minutes of uptime. I have noticed this came in via 30eb1dc2c430
> > ("mac80211: properly track HT/VHT operation changes").
>
> Right, but that went into 3.9 :-)
>
> > Is this something to be worried about?
>
> Not at all. I suppose we could make this a debug message though, it's
> not super useful when it happens OK (sometimes it causes disconnections
> when we can't support the new mode, which is more relevant).
OK, I see. Then I would suggest lowering the loglevel ;)
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists