[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fumhtxb7.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:40:28 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 9e5f68842276 ("powerpc: Fix missing CRCs, add more asm-prototypes.h declarations")
>
> from the powerpc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 82de5797a260 ("powerpc: Remove extraneous header from asm-prototypes.h")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks. I'm planning to merge fixes into next RSN ... as soon as people
stop finding bugs.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists