lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161124135353.570f943a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:53:53 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc-paulus tree with the
 powerpc tree

Hi Paul,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc-paulus tree got a conflict in:

  arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-radix.c

between commit:

  555c16328ae6 ("powerpc/mm: Correct process and partition table max size")

from the powerpc tree and commit:

  9d66195807ac ("powerpc/64: Provide functions for accessing POWER9 partition table")

from the kvm-ppc-paulus tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ