[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <896300862.1733962.1480006726386.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:58:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: minor irqchip improvements (API change)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 5:31:28 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: minor irqchip improvements (API change)
>
> There are two API changes:
> 1) [1/6] forbids KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP after KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP
> 2) [5/6] makes KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING reject pic and ioapic routes in split
> irqchip mode, because they make no sense and are currently "working" only
> because of a hacky NULL check.
>
> [1-4/6] are needed for [5/6]; [6/6] is just a cherry.
Looks good---but they don't apply directly on top of kvm/next so we have
to delay them until -rc2 or a second 4.11 pull request.
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Radim Krčmář (6):
> KVM: x86: do allow kvm irqchip with split irqchip
> KVM: x86: decouple irqchip_in_kernel() and pic_irqchip()
> KVM: x86: make pic setup code look like ioapic setup
> KVM: x86: refactor pic setup in kvm_set_routing_entry
> KVM: x86: prevent setup of invalid routes
> KVM: x86: simplify conditions with split/kvm irqchip
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kvm/irq.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.10.2
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists