linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: am57xx-beagle-x15-common: Add overide powerhold property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <07fe0118-d3c0-2d47-0642-ae90624c0ed0@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:15:01 +0530
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <nm@...com>, <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: am57xx-beagle-x15-common: Add overide
 powerhold property



On Wednesday 23 November 2016 09:38 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> [161123 00:33]:
>> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 02:03 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Keerthy wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 15 November 2016 05:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>> * Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> [161109 21:10]:
>>>>>> The PMICs have POWERHOLD set by default which prevents PMIC shutdown
>>>>>> even on DEV_CTRL On bit set to 0 as the Powerhold has higher priority.
>>>>>> So to enable pmic power off this property lets one over ride the default
>>>>>> value and enable pmic power off.
>>>>>
>>>>> This should not cause merge conflicts so probably best to merge along
>>>>> with the driver changes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you guys want me to pick up this separately let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Lee Jones,
>>>>
>>>> Are you planning to pull DT and Documentation patches as well?
>>>
>>> No need.  They can be safely applied to their own subsystems.
>>
>> Okay. Thanks for the response.
>>
>> Tony,
>>
>> Hope you can pull the DT patches.
>
> Applying both into omap-for-v4.10/dt thanks. Please send dts changes
> seprately next time if there are no dependencies. This leaves out
> the second guessing who should apply what.

Sure Tony.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>