| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <26be0fa2adbd906c3f999a86660a26632a4e1ce5.1480062521.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:30:02 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 089/127] net: Add netdev all_adj_list refcnt propagation to fix panic
From: Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
[ Upstream commit 93409033ae653f1c9a949202fb537ab095b2092f ]
This is a respin of a patch to fix a relatively easily reproducible kernel
panic related to the all_adj_list handling for netdevs in recent kernels.
The following sequence of commands will reproduce the issue:
ip link add link eth0 name eth0.100 type vlan id 100
ip link add link eth0 name eth0.200 type vlan id 200
ip link add name testbr type bridge
ip link set eth0.100 master testbr
ip link set eth0.200 master testbr
ip link add link testbr mac0 type macvlan
ip link delete dev testbr
This creates an upper/lower tree of (excuse the poor ASCII art):
/---eth0.100-eth0
mac0-testbr-
\---eth0.200-eth0
When testbr is deleted, the all_adj_lists are walked, and eth0 is deleted twice from
the mac0 list. Unfortunately, during setup in __netdev_upper_dev_link, only one
reference to eth0 is added, so this results in a panic.
This change adds reference count propagation so things are handled properly.
Matthias Schiffer reported a similar crash in batman-adv:
https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/issues/680
https://www.open-mesh.org/issues/247
which this patch also seems to resolve.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Collins <acollins@...dlepoint.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
net/core/dev.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d30c12263f38..b3788eb33ce4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4546,6 +4546,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu);
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
bool neighbour, bool master,
bool upper)
{
@@ -4555,7 +4556,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
if (adj) {
BUG_ON(neighbour);
- adj->ref_nr++;
+ adj->ref_nr += ref_nr;
return 0;
}
@@ -4566,7 +4567,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj->dev = adj_dev;
adj->master = master;
adj->neighbour = neighbour;
- adj->ref_nr = 1;
+ adj->ref_nr = ref_nr;
dev_hold(adj_dev);
pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of %s link added from %s to %s\n",
@@ -4589,22 +4590,25 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
static inline int __netdev_upper_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *udev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
bool master, bool neighbour)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, neighbour, master,
- true);
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, udev, ref_nr, neighbour,
+ master, true);
}
static inline int __netdev_lower_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *ldev,
+ u16 ref_nr,
bool neighbour)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, neighbour, false,
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, ldev, ref_nr, neighbour, false,
false);
}
void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *adj_dev, bool upper)
+ struct net_device *adj_dev, u16 ref_nr,
+ bool upper)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
@@ -4616,8 +4620,8 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
if (!adj)
BUG();
- if (adj->ref_nr > 1) {
- adj->ref_nr--;
+ if (adj->ref_nr > ref_nr) {
+ adj->ref_nr -= ref_nr;
return;
}
@@ -4630,30 +4634,33 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
}
static inline void __netdev_upper_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *udev)
+ struct net_device *udev,
+ u16 ref_nr)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, true);
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, ref_nr, true);
}
static inline void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *ldev)
+ struct net_device *ldev,
+ u16 ref_nr)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, false);
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, ref_nr, false);
}
int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
- bool master, bool neighbour)
+ u16 ref_nr, bool master, bool neighbour)
{
int ret;
- ret = __netdev_upper_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, master, neighbour);
+ ret = __netdev_upper_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, master,
+ neighbour);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_lower_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, neighbour);
+ ret = __netdev_lower_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, neighbour);
if (ret) {
- __netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr);
return ret;
}
@@ -4661,23 +4668,25 @@ int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
}
static inline int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *udev)
+ struct net_device *udev,
+ u16 ref_nr)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, false, false);
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, ref_nr, false,
+ false);
}
static inline int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *udev,
bool master)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, master, true);
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, 1, master, true);
}
void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev)
+ struct net_device *upper_dev, u16 ref_nr)
{
- __netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev);
- __netdev_lower_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev);
+ __netdev_upper_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr);
+ __netdev_lower_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr);
}
@@ -4713,7 +4722,8 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
*/
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) {
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) {
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev,
+ i->ref_nr);
if (ret)
goto rollback_mesh;
}
@@ -4721,14 +4731,14 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
/* add dev to every upper_dev's upper device */
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) {
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
if (ret)
goto rollback_upper_mesh;
}
/* add upper_dev to every dev's lower device */
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) {
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
if (ret)
goto rollback_lower_mesh;
}
@@ -4741,7 +4751,7 @@ rollback_lower_mesh:
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list) {
if (i == to_i)
break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
}
i = NULL;
@@ -4751,7 +4761,7 @@ rollback_upper_mesh:
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) {
if (i == to_i)
break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
}
i = j = NULL;
@@ -4763,13 +4773,13 @@ rollback_mesh:
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list) {
if (i == to_i && j == to_j)
break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
}
if (i == to_i)
break;
}
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
return ret;
}
@@ -4823,7 +4833,7 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j;
ASSERT_RTNL();
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
/* Here is the tricky part. We must remove all dev's lower
* devices from all upper_dev's upper devices and vice
@@ -4831,16 +4841,16 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
*/
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list)
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
/* remove also the devices itself from lower/upper device
* list
*/
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->lower_dev_list, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->upper_dev_list, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev);
}
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists