linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/67] 4.8.11-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161125094638.GB20080@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:46:38 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/67] 4.8.11-stable review

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:40PM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 207 boots: 8 failed, 196 passed with 3 offline (v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
> Git Describe: v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7
> Git Commit: 5b1cb43a9ac7f608fdfc590c139aa66ead8d19ed
> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 57 unique boards, 18 SoC families, 30 builds out of 207
> 
> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7&fail
> 
> arm:
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>         exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>         at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 failed lab
> 
>     exynos_defconfig:
>         exynos5250-arndale: 1 failed lab
> 
> x86:
> 
>     defconfig+CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     defconfig+CONFIG_KASAN=y:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     defconfig+kvm_guest:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     x86_64_defconfig:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab

That's not good, is this a code problem, or a "lab" problem?

The logs look like nothing is working for these, so is this a -rc
problem?

thanks,

greg k-h