linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4] mfd: wm8994-core: Don't use managed regulator bulk get API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:11:10 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
        patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mfd: wm8994-core: Don't use managed regulator bulk
 get API

On 25-11-16, 10:41, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > On 25-11-16, 10:14, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The kernel WARNs and then crashes today if wm8994_device_init() fails
> > > > after calling devm_regulator_bulk_get().
> > > > 
> > > > That happens because there are multiple devices involved here and the
> > > > order in which managed resources are freed isn't correct.
> > > > 
> > > > The regulators are added as children of wm8994->dev.  Whereas,
> > > > devm_regulator_bulk_get() receives wm8994->dev as the device, though it
> > > > gets the same regulators which were added as children of wm8994->dev
> > > > earlier.
> > > > 
> > > > During failures, the children are removed first and the core eventually
> > > > calls regulator_unregister() for them. As regulator_put() was never done
> > > > for them (opposite of devm_regulator_bulk_get()), the kernel WARNs at
> > > > 
> > > > 	WARN_ON(rdev->open_count);
> > > > 
> > > > And eventually it crashes from debugfs_remove_recursive().
> > > 
> > > Is ...
> > > 
> > >    mfd: wm8994-core: disable regulators before removing them
> > > 
> > > ... required as well, or is that separate?
> > 
> > It would be better if we get that too. Anyway, the $subject patch has a
> > dependency on it..
> 
> Which is ... ?

I meant rebase dependency, nothing else.

-- 
viresh