linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: uniphier: add clock data for cpufreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNASJ7nA7rmJdmF_1xei7qG+3CTd-8UgJoPtAzcvZ0N7ckw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:55:30 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: uniphier: add clock data for cpufreq

Hi Stephen,


2016-11-24 11:10 GMT+09:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>:

>> If I drop 32bit SoC things, and send v2 only for 64bit SoCs,
>> is that acceptable for 4.10-rc1?
>
> Sure. That sounds fine for now. I'll reply to your other thread
> with a plan of attack on how to do the framework changes. I think
> we need to do those regardless of the outcome of your
> investigation.

I posted v2 yesterday.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada