linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] staging: lustre: libcfs: remove NULL comparisons in headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161125120841.GC6266@mwanda>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:17:37 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] staging: lustre: libcfs: remove NULL comparisons
 in headers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:48:42AM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> index 93bff1b..fc180b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
>  
>  #define LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST(ptr, size)					    \
>  do {									    \
> -	if (unlikely((ptr) == NULL)) {					    \
> +	if (!unlikely((ptr))) {						    \

Argh....  No.  You did this with a Perl script?

This should be:

	if (unlikely(!ptr)) { ...

>  		CERROR("LNET: out of memory at %s:%d (tried to alloc '"	    \
>  		       #ptr "' = %d)\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, (int)(size));  \
>  	} else {							    \
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
>  
>  #define LIBCFS_FREE(ptr, size)					  \
>  do {								    \
> -	if (unlikely((ptr) == NULL)) {				  \
> +	if (!unlikely((ptr))) {						\

Same.

Otherwise the unlikely hint is reversed from what we want.

regards,
dan carpenter