[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_w-w7a8TA1Y=y2+Ek5vH4BvDUTMOcp68=3bsuT1Njg7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:51:38 +0000
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] efi: Get the secure boot status [ver #3]
On 25 November 2016 at 16:50, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> + /* UEFI-2.6 requires DeployedMode to be 1. */
>> + if (sys_table_arg->hdr.revision == EFI_2_60_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION) {
>
> Actually, I suspect that this should be '>='.
>
yes, I actually pointed that out in my reply (although somewhat tersely)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists