linux-kernel - [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Fix kernel version error in ubuntu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-d18acd15c6dfb669f0463afa31ac5343594d2fe2@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:20:45 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Wang Nan <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     lizefan@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        hekuang@...wei.com, hpa@...or.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
        acme@...hat.com, ast@...com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Fix kernel version error in ubuntu

Commit-ID:  d18acd15c6dfb669f0463afa31ac5343594d2fe2
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d18acd15c6dfb669f0463afa31ac5343594d2fe2
Author:     Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:05:44 +0000
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:00:30 -0300

perf tools: Fix kernel version error in ubuntu

On ubuntu the internal kernel version code is different from what can
be retrived from uname:

 $ uname -r
 4.4.0-47-generic
 $ cat /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
 #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 263192
 #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
 $ cat /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include/generated/utsrelease.h
 #define UTS_RELEASE "4.4.0-47-generic"
 #define UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI 47
 $ cat /proc/version_signature
 Ubuntu 4.4.0-47.68-generic 4.4.24

The macro LINUX_VERSION_CODE is set to 4.4.24 (263192 == 0x40418), but
`uname -r` reports 4.4.0.

This mismatch causes LINUX_VERSION_CODE macro passed to BPF script become
an incorrect value, results in magic failure in BPF loading:

 $ sudo ./buildperf/perf record -e ./tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c ls
 event syntax error: './tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c'
                      \___ Failed to load program for unknown reason

According to Ubuntu document (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/FAQ), the
correct kernel version can be retrived through /proc/version_signature, which
is ubuntu specific.

This patch checks the existance of /proc/version_signature, and returns
version number through parsing this file instead of uname. Version string
is untouched (value returns from uname) because `uname -r` is required
to be consistence with path of kbuild directory in /lib/module.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@....com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161115040617.69788-2-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/util.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/util.c b/tools/perf/util/util.c
index 5bbd1f6..67ac765 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/util.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/util.c
@@ -637,12 +637,63 @@ bool find_process(const char *name)
 	return ret ? false : true;
 }
 
+static int
+fetch_ubuntu_kernel_version(unsigned int *puint)
+{
+	ssize_t len;
+	size_t line_len = 0;
+	char *ptr, *line = NULL;
+	int version, patchlevel, sublevel, err;
+	FILE *vsig = fopen("/proc/version_signature", "r");
+
+	if (!vsig) {
+		pr_debug("Open /proc/version_signature failed: %s\n",
+			 strerror(errno));
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	len = getline(&line, &line_len, vsig);
+	fclose(vsig);
+	err = -1;
+	if (len <= 0) {
+		pr_debug("Reading from /proc/version_signature failed: %s\n",
+			 strerror(errno));
+		goto errout;
+	}
+
+	ptr = strrchr(line, ' ');
+	if (!ptr) {
+		pr_debug("Parsing /proc/version_signature failed: %s\n", line);
+		goto errout;
+	}
+
+	err = sscanf(ptr + 1, "%d.%d.%d",
+		     &version, &patchlevel, &sublevel);
+	if (err != 3) {
+		pr_debug("Unable to get kernel version from /proc/version_signature '%s'\n",
+			 line);
+		goto errout;
+	}
+
+	if (puint)
+		*puint = (version << 16) + (patchlevel << 8) + sublevel;
+	err = 0;
+errout:
+	free(line);
+	return err;
+}
+
 int
 fetch_kernel_version(unsigned int *puint, char *str,
 		     size_t str_size)
 {
 	struct utsname utsname;
 	int version, patchlevel, sublevel, err;
+	bool int_ver_ready = false;
+
+	if (access("/proc/version_signature", R_OK) == 0)
+		if (!fetch_ubuntu_kernel_version(puint))
+			int_ver_ready = true;
 
 	if (uname(&utsname))
 		return -1;
@@ -656,12 +707,12 @@ fetch_kernel_version(unsigned int *puint, char *str,
 		     &version, &patchlevel, &sublevel);
 
 	if (err != 3) {
-		pr_debug("Unablt to get kernel version from uname '%s'\n",
+		pr_debug("Unable to get kernel version from uname '%s'\n",
 			 utsname.release);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (puint)
+	if (puint && !int_ver_ready)
 		*puint = (version << 16) + (patchlevel << 8) + sublevel;
 	return 0;
 }