linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161125175009.GA326@mail.hallyn.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:50:09 -0600
From:   "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:     "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even
 more magic

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:33:50AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Serge,
> 
> On 11/24/2016 11:52 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) (mtk.manpages@...il.com):
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> Could we have a man-pages patch for this feature? Presumably for 
> >> user_namespaces(7) or capabilities(7).
> > 
> > capabilities.7 doesn't actually mention anything about user namespaces
> > right now.  
> 
> True. There's really just this:
> 
>    Interaction with user namespaces
>        For a discussion of  the  interaction  of  capabilities  and  user
>        namespaces, see user_namespaces(7).
> 
> > I'll come up with a patch for both I think.  Do you have a
> > deadline for a new release coming up?
> 
> No deadlines as such. The last couple of years, as a sort of 
> experiment, I've fallen into the same release cycle as the kernel
> (typically making a release in the week or so after the kernel release),
> and I am even using a similar numbering scheme. Ideally, the man-pages
> patch would go into the release that corresponds to the kernel release
> that makes the change.

Cool - I'll write something up in the next few weeks.