[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1480102557.19726.33.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:35:57 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stacktrace: fix print_stack_trace printing
timestamp twice
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 18:40 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> But should we add KERN_CONT to print_ip_sym instead of duplicating it
> everywhere? Or add print_ip_sym_cont?
There are only a couple dozen uses of print_ip_sym.
It might be better to use "[<%p>] %pS" directly
everywhere and remove print_ip_sym instead to
avoid the KERN_CONT and avoid all possible
interleaved output.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists