linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87eg1zqqub.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date:   Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:53:00 +0100
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@...il.com>,
        Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...nezx.org>,
        Harald Welte <laforge@...nezx.org>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "openezx-devel\@lists.openezx.org" <openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data

Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org> writes:

> Hello.
>
> On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910,
>> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a
>> configuration with only a910:
>> 
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' undeclared here (not in a function)
>> 
>> This moves the definition into its own section.
>> 
>> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>
> I wonder what we should do with ezx.c.
>
> As far as I know neither Daniel nor Harald or myself are doing anything
> with this devices anymore. Besides a basic compile test having an ack or
> reviewed by from our side is a bit worthless. :/
>
> I should still have some of these phones around in a box somewhere. If
> there is someone with a good motivation and time to take over on this
> platform we will find a way to get the person this devices.
>
> Any takers? Robert? I guess you are already overloaded but you might
> also have an interest. Worth asking :)
Oh yes, I'm very interested in your box. Besides I really like old platforms
:)

> In the case nobody wants to pick up here what would you consider the
> bets way forward? I could send a patch removing ezx platform support
> from the kernel (basically ezx.c plus build support) or I can send a
> patch marking it at least orphan in MAINTAINERS. Let me know what you think.
>
> Daniel, Harald, if one of you is still interested in these and what to
> pick up the work again, please speak up now. :)
Unless another maintainer steps in, you can submit a patch to transfer the
maintainance onto me, and we'll see off mailing lists how we could arange the
boards transfer.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert