linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] orangefs: Axe some dead code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161125215139.GM6266@mwanda>
Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:51:39 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
Cc:     Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] orangefs: Axe some dead code

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:31:11AM -0500, Mike Marshall wrote:
> This seems like a good and proper patch to me, and simple too.
> But like all changes, it needs tested. While I was testing it, I
> discovered a regression in the associated userspace code. I
> "bisected" (we use SVN for the userspace part of Orangefs)
> down to the commit that caused the regression, and some
> of the userspace folks are going to fix it.
> 
> I don't think I should ask Linus to pull this patch until I can
> test it. Since we're about to go into rc7, it might not go in
> until the next go around...
> 

Linus is on 4.9-rc7 so you're saying this would probably go into 4.11?

regards,
dan carpenter