linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:30:52 +0100
From:   Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
To:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@...il.com>,
        Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...nezx.org>,
        Harald Welte <laforge@...nezx.org>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org" <openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ao2@....it" <ao2@....it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data

Hello.

On 25.11.2016 20:53, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org> writes:
> 
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910,
>>> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a
>>> configuration with only a910:
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>>
>>> This moves the definition into its own section.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>
>> I wonder what we should do with ezx.c.
>>
>> As far as I know neither Daniel nor Harald or myself are doing anything
>> with this devices anymore. Besides a basic compile test having an ack or
>> reviewed by from our side is a bit worthless. :/
>>
>> I should still have some of these phones around in a box somewhere. If
>> there is someone with a good motivation and time to take over on this
>> platform we will find a way to get the person this devices.
>>
>> Any takers? Robert? I guess you are already overloaded but you might
>> also have an interest. Worth asking :)
> Oh yes, I'm very interested in your box. Besides I really like old platforms
> :)


Great! I should have at least 3 or 4 different devices from the EZX
platform around. I will go and search for the box over the weekend :)

>> In the case nobody wants to pick up here what would you consider the
>> bets way forward? I could send a patch removing ezx platform support
>> from the kernel (basically ezx.c plus build support) or I can send a
>> patch marking it at least orphan in MAINTAINERS. Let me know what you think.
>>
>> Daniel, Harald, if one of you is still interested in these and what to
>> pick up the work again, please speak up now. :)
> Unless another maintainer steps in, you can submit a patch to transfer the
> maintainance onto me, and we'll see off mailing lists how we could arange the
> boards transfer.

I cc'ed another developer who did a lot of work regarding EZX.

Antonio, as you can see from the mail above we are pondering what who
will maintain the ezx platform in the kernel going forward. Neither
Daniel, Harald or me is going to do so. If you have time, interest and
motivation to do so please speak up. I know life moved on and you ahve
other projects and interests so do not feel pressured here. Just say no
if you have no interest. Robert already agreed to act as a fallback so
we would still be safe. :)

regards
Stefan Schmidt